|
https://medium.com/@heatherdr
Humans by nature are designed to survive. One's definition of survival is as unique as each person's human performance. But survival means survival of one's own life, not the life of a stranger. Survival can mean having food and shelter to some and it can mean having more money and a better home and car to another. But the very nature of this attitude of survival is egocentric. For folks who feel a sense of personal safety that comes from having the things one needs to survive, meaning shelter, food, water, and a non threatening environment, a person can than think of others. Certainly for me, my son's experience became as important if not more important than my own experience when he was young. I made sacrifices so he could thrive. The difference between surviving and thriving is this...
My son has always therefore had a life that revolved around thriving, not survival. Most of us living in North America can claim the same... access to health care, access to food, water, and work. The only global threat to our physical safety came from a virus which led to protections from our government and pharmaceutical companies. We have lived, especially in Canada, in a fairly safe environment. There have been crimes committed by people who perhaps feel desperate and may be motivated by a desire for something they feel they are lacking. But those threats have also not been so wide spread that we need to fear for our lives on a regular basis. Not like people in war torn countries where one's life can change in an instant and those instances are happening with some regularity. Because of our comfort, our lives of thriving, it can be very easy to forget how lucky we are. It is easy to forget to be grateful. It is easy to become complacent. In our complacency we can ignore the signs that perhaps we should be paying closer attention to the things that support our ability to thrive. When a person moves from thriving to surviving, the lens of morality can shift. If someone is pointing a gun at you, perhaps your own willingness to mortally wound someone else becomes a viable choice. Is it possible in this world we are living in now in North America, that the lens had changed, our sense of personal safety has changed and we are each experiencing more personal threats to our survival? In turn, our own morality is shifting. I have certainly had immoral thoughts in the past year that I am chagrined to admit to.
In turn, is that changing how we treat each other? After all, we all faced Covid. We all faced the real personal threat of a life threatening virus. Millions did not make it. There was a recognition for all of us, whether we lost someone we love or not, that we are not immortal. We will eventually die. Nothing can save us from that outcome. Our ability to thrive was threatened. Many lost income. Many lost jobs. Many lost their home. The national debt has ballooned. Our ability to thrive has been compromised. Are we confusing surviving with thriving? How is that impacting our morality? I don't have the answer. But I hope you consider my questions. The way we think and feel, even subconsciously, vibrates out into our communities and influences how others think and feel. Can we all consider gratitude as a practice? Can we all consider having the generosity of spirit and bravery to help someone who is truly threatened? Can we choose to be like the gentleman I met at the grocery store instead of fearful and egocentric? Can we choose peace even when we feel threatened?
0 Comments
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Heatherdr
|
|
2021 Heather D Reynolds
|